The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic analysis of cuproptosis-related genes in immunological characterization and predictive drugs in Alzheimer’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1204530 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bin Nie, Yefen Duan, Xuelong Xie, Lihua Qiu, Shaorui Shi, Zhili Fan, Xuxiang Zheng, Ling Jiang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,681,333
of 24,791,202 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,286
of 5,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,765
of 240,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#34
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,791,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.