The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The intracerebral injection of Aβ1-42 oligomers does not invariably alter seizure susceptibility in mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, September 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1239140 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maxime Vande Vyver, Louise Daeninck, Gino De Smet, Najat Aourz, Surajit Sahu, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Kris Pauwels, Dimitri De Bundel, Ilse Smolders |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 50% |
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 1 | 50% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,618,412
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,241
of 5,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,941
of 245,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#33
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.