The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trends in cause-specific mortality among persons with Alzheimer’s disease in South Carolina: 2014 to 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1387082 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candace S. Brown, Xi Ning, Amy Money, Mauriah Alford, Yinghao Pan, Margaret Miller, Matthew Lohman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,189,676
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#1,222
of 5,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,119
of 342,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#7
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.