The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Longitudinal assessment of plasma biomarkers for early detection of cognitive changes in subjective cognitive decline
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, May 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1389595 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cheng-Hao Hsieh, Chien-An Ko, Chih-Sung Liang, Po-Kuan Yeh, Chia-Kuang Tsai, Chia-Lin Tsai, Guan-Yu Lin, Yu-Kai Lin, Ming-Chen Tsai, Fu-Chi Yang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 47% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 47% |
Psychology | 2 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2024.
All research outputs
#5,021,211
of 26,102,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,417
of 5,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,213
of 224,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#11
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,102,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.