↓ Skip to main content

Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between oxidative stress and Parkinson’s disease
Published in
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1423773
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingling Lv, Zhe Long, Xuling Tan, Lixia Qin, Weiqian Yan, Hainan Zhang, Feng Ren, Chunyu Wang

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,091,568
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,442
of 5,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,133
of 219,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#13
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.