The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Visualization and assessment of cerebral vasculature, cerebrospinal fluids, and the brain parenchyma in dementia and aging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1443028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianpan Huang, Yachao Zhang, Lin Chen, Dengrong Jiang, Zixuan Lin |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,060,223
of 26,250,639 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#2,433
of 5,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,908
of 202,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,250,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.