↓ Skip to main content

Histological validation of high-resolution DTI in human post mortem tissue

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histological validation of high-resolution DTI in human post mortem tissue
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2015.00098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Seehaus, Alard Roebroeck, Matteo Bastiani, Lúcia Fonseca, Hansjürgen Bratzke, Nicolás Lori, Anna Vilanova, Rainer Goebel, Ralf Galuske

Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is amongst the simplest mathematical models available for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, yet still by far the most used one. Despite the success of DTI as an imaging tool for white matter fibers, its anatomical underpinnings on a microstructural basis remain unclear. In this study, we used 65 myelin-stained sections of human premotor cortex to validate modeled fiber orientations and oft used microstructure-sensitive scalar measures of DTI on the level of individual voxels. We performed this validation on high spatial resolution diffusion MRI acquisitions investigating both white and gray matter. We found a very good agreement between DTI and myelin orientations with the majority of voxels showing angular differences less than 10°. The agreement was strongest in white matter, particularly in unidirectional fiber pathways. In gray matter, the agreement was good in the deeper layers highlighting radial fiber directions even at lower fractional anisotropy (FA) compared to white matter. This result has potentially important implications for tractography algorithms applied to high resolution diffusion MRI data if the aim is to move across the gray/white matter boundary. We found strong relationships between myelin microstructure and DTI-based microstructure-sensitive measures. High FA values were linked to high myelin density and a sharply tuned histological orientation profile. Conversely, high values of mean diffusivity (MD) were linked to bimodal or diffuse orientation distributions and low myelin density. At high spatial resolution, DTI-based measures can be highly sensitive to white and gray matter microstructure despite being relatively unspecific to concrete microarchitectural aspects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 201 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 27%
Researcher 38 18%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 50 24%
Engineering 22 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 10%
Psychology 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,149,371
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#177
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,049
of 275,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.