You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In Vivo Mapping of Cortical Columnar Networks in the Monkey with Focal Electrical and Optical Stimulation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2015.00135 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna Wang Roe, Mykyta M. Chernov, Robert M. Friedman, Gang Chen |
Abstract |
There are currently largescale efforts to understand the brain as a connection machine. However, there has been little emphasis on understanding connection patterns between functionally specific cortical columns. Here, we review development and application of focal electrical and optical stimulation methods combined with optical imaging and fMRI mapping in the non-human primate. These new approaches, when applied systematically on a large scale, will elucidate functionally specific intra-areal and inter-areal network connection patterns. Such functionally specific network data can provide accurate views of brain network topology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 22% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 30 | 41% |
Engineering | 11 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 14% |
Psychology | 3 | 4% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,450,206
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#572
of 1,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,501
of 252,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.