↓ Skip to main content

Whole Brain Imaging with Serial Two-Photon Tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole Brain Imaging with Serial Two-Photon Tomography
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2016.00031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen P. Amato, Feng Pan, Joel Schwartz, Timothy M. Ragan

Abstract

Imaging entire mouse brains at submicron resolution has historically been a challenging undertaking and largely confined to the province of dedicated atlasing initiatives. This has limited systematic investigations into important areas of neuroscience, such as neural circuits, brain mapping and neurodegeneration. In this article, we describe in detail Serial Two-Photon (STP) tomography, a robust, reliable method for imaging entire brains with histological detail. We provide examples of how the basic methodology can be extended to other imaging modalities, such as Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), in order to provide unique contrast mechanisms. Furthermore, we provide a survey of the research that STP tomography has enabled in the field of neuroscience, provide examples of how this technology enables quantitative whole brain studies, and discuss the current limitations of STP tomography-based approaches.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 24%
Engineering 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Physics and Astronomy 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,852,912
of 26,401,177 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#82
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,075
of 316,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,401,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.