↓ Skip to main content

Identification of Functional Cell Groups in the Abducens Nucleus of Monkey and Human by Perineuronal Nets and Choline Acetyltransferase Immunolabeling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of Functional Cell Groups in the Abducens Nucleus of Monkey and Human by Perineuronal Nets and Choline Acetyltransferase Immunolabeling
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2018.00045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja K. E. Horn, Annie Horng, Norbert Buresch, Ahmed Messoudi, Wolfgang Härtig

Abstract

The abducens nucleus (nVI) contains several functional cell groups: motoneurons of the singly-innervated twitch muscle fibers (SIF) and those of the multiply-innervated muscle fibers (MIF) of the lateral rectus muscle (LR), internuclear neurons (INTs) projecting to the contralateral oculomotor nucleus (nIII) and paramedian tract-neurons (PMT) that receive input from premotor neurons of the oculomotor system and project to the floccular region. In monkey, these cell populations can be delineated by their chemical signature. For correlative clinico-pathological studies the identification of the homologous cell groups in the human nVI are required. In this study, we plotted the distribution of these populations in monkey nVI by combined tract-tracing and immunohistochemical staining facilitating the identification of homologous cell groups in man. Paraffin sections of two Rhesus monkeys fixed with 4% paraformaldhehyde and immunostained with antibodies directed against choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) as marker enzyme for cholinergic neurons and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) to detect perineuronal nets (PNs) revealed four neuron populations in nVI with different chemical signatures: ChAT-positive and CSPG-positive SIF motoneurons, ChAT-positive, but CSPG-negative MIF motoneurons, and ChAT-negative neurons with prominent PNs that were considered as INTs. This was confirmed by combined immunofluorescence labeling of cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) or wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and ChAT or CSPG in nVI sections from cases with tracer injections into nIII. In the rostral part of nVI and at its medial border, populations of ChAT-negative groups with weak CSPG-staining, but with strong acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity, were identified as PMT cell groups by correlating them with the location of anterograde tracer labeling from INTs in nIII. Applying ChAT- and CSPG-immunostaining as well as AChE staining to human brainstem sections four neuron groups with the same chemical signature as those in monkey could be identified in and around the nVI in human. In conclusion, the distribution of nVI neuron populations was identified in human based on findings in monkey utilizing their markers for cholinergic neurons and their different ensheathment by PNs of the extracellular matrix.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,640,437
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#929
of 1,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,990
of 328,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.