↓ Skip to main content

Tailored Sample Mounting for Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy of Clarified Specimens by Polydimethylsiloxane Casting

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tailored Sample Mounting for Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy of Clarified Specimens by Polydimethylsiloxane Casting
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, March 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnana.2019.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonino Paolo Di Giovanna, Caterina Credi, Alessandra Franceschini, Marie Caroline Müllenbroich, Ludovico Silvestri, Francesco Saverio Pavone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Master 5 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 24%
Physics and Astronomy 4 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,568,386
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#796
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,845
of 351,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.