The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Post-mortem 11.7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs. Polarized Light Imaging Microscopy to Measure the Angle and Orientation of Dorsal Root Afferents in the Human Cervical Dorsal Root Entry Zone
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2019.00066 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dylan Jozef Hendrik Augustinus Henssen, Rosanna Christina Weber, Jesse de Boef, Jeroen Mollink, Tamas Kozicz, Erkan Kurt, Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 7 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,574,182
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#1,018
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,975
of 348,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.