The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated Individualization of Size-Varying and Touching Neurons in Macaque Cerebral Microscopic Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2019.00098 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhenzhen You, Yaël Balbastre, Clément Bouvier, Anne-Sophie Hérard, Pauline Gipchtein, Philippe Hantraye, Caroline Jan, Nicolas Souedet, Thierry Delzescaux |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 4 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,319,810
of 26,456,908 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#186
of 1,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,043
of 471,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,456,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.