You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subregional Density of Neurons, Neurofibrillary Tangles and Amyloid Plaques in the Hippocampus of Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2019.00099 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diana Furcila, Marta Domínguez-Álvaro, Javier DeFelipe, Lidia Alonso-Nanclares |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 26% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,666,172
of 26,189,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#73
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,481
of 483,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,189,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.