The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Niwaki Instead of Random Forests: Targeted Serial Sectioning Scanning Electron Microscopy With Reimaging Capabilities for Exploring Central Nervous System Cell Biology and Pathology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2021.732506 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martina Schifferer, Nicolas Snaidero, Minou Djannatian, Martin Kerschensteiner, Thomas Misgeld |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 33% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 4 | 27% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 27% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,077,478
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#437
of 1,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,922
of 434,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.