The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Differently increased volumes of multiple brain areas in Npc1 mutant mice following various drug treatments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnana.2024.1430790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Veronica Antipova, Diana Heimes, Katharina Seidel, Jennifer Schulz, Oliver Schmitt, Carsten Holzmann, Arndt Rolfs, Hans-Jürgen Bidmon, Estibaliz González de San Román Martín, Pitter F. Huesgen, Katrin Amunts, Jonas Keiler, Niels Hammer, Martin Witt, Andreas Wree |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#18,017,504
of 26,356,696 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#872
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,672
of 152,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,356,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.