↓ Skip to main content

An Alarm Pheromone Modulates Appetitive Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee (Apis Mellifera)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Alarm Pheromone Modulates Appetitive Olfactory Learning in the Honeybee (Apis Mellifera)
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00157
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elodie Urlacher, Bernard Francés, Martin Giurfa, Jean-Marc Devaud

Abstract

In honeybees, associative learning is embedded in a social context as bees possess a highly complex social organization in which communication among individuals is mediated by dance behavior informing about food sources, and by a high variety of pheromones that maintain the social links between individuals of a hive. Proboscis extension response conditioning is a case of appetitive learning, in which harnessed bees learn to associate odor stimuli with sucrose reward in the laboratory. Despite its recurrent use as a tool for uncovering the behavioral, cellular, and molecular bases underlying associative learning, the question of whether social signals (pheromones) affect appetitive learning has not been addressed in this experimental framework. This situation contrasts with reports underlining that foraging activity of bees is modulated by alarm pheromones released in the presence of a potential danger. Here, we show that appetitive learning is impaired by the sting alarm pheromone (SAP) which, when released by guards, recruits foragers to defend the hive. This effect is mimicked by the main component of SAP, isopentyl acetate, is dose-dependent and lasts up to 24 h. Learning impairment is specific to alarm signal exposure and is independent of the odorant used for conditioning. Our results suggest that learning impairment may be a response to the biological significance of SAP as an alarm signal, which would detract bees from responding to any appetitive stimuli in a situation in which such responses would be of secondary importance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 8 7%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 106 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 58%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 21 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,154,661
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,812
of 3,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,538
of 163,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.