↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring extracellular pH, oxygen, and dopamine during reward delivery in the striatum of primates

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring extracellular pH, oxygen, and dopamine during reward delivery in the striatum of primates
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer L. Ariansen, Michael L. A. V. Heien, Andre Hermans, Paul E. M. Phillips, Istvan Hernadi, Maria A. Bermudez, Wolfram Schultz, R. Mark Wightman

Abstract

Spike timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) is under neuromodulatory control, which is correlated with distinct behavioral states. Previously we reported that dopamine, a reward signal, broadens the time window for synaptic potentiation and modulates the outcome of hippocampal STDP even when applied after the plasticity induction protocol (Brzosko et al., 2015). Here we demonstrate that sequential neuromodulation of STDP by acetylcholine and dopamine offers an efficacious model of reward-based navigation. Specifically, our experimental data in mouse hippocampal slices show that acetylcholine biases STDP towards synaptic depression, whilst subsequent application of dopamine converts this depression into potentiation. Incorporating this bidirectional neuromodulation-enabled correlational synaptic learning rule into a computational model yields effective navigation towards changing reward locations, as in natural foraging behavior. Thus, temporally sequenced neuromodulation of STDP enables associations to be made between actions and outcomes and also provides a possible mechanism for aligning the time scales of cellular and behavioral learning.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Professor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 17%
Chemistry 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Engineering 10 13%
Psychology 7 9%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,281,784
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#595
of 3,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,162
of 244,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#10
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.