↓ Skip to main content

A case of musical preference for Johnny Cash following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 3,519)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
207 X users
facebook
20 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A case of musical preference for Johnny Cash following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariska Mantione, Martijn Figee, Damiaan Denys

Abstract

Music is among all cultures an important part of the live of most people. Music has psychological benefits and may generate strong emotional and physiological responses. Recently, neuroscientists have discovered that music influences the reward circuit of the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), even when no explicit reward is present. In this clinical case study, we describe a 60-year old patient who developed a sudden and distinct musical preference for Johnny Cash following deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeted at the NAcc. This case report substantiates the assumption that the NAcc is involved in musical preference, based on the observation of direct stimulation of the accumbens with DBS. It also shows that accumbens DBS can change musical preference without habituation of its rewarding properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 106 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Researcher 18 15%
Professor 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Neuroscience 17 14%
Psychology 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 374. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#89,699
of 26,577,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#25
of 3,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#647
of 242,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,577,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.