↓ Skip to main content

Internet Addictive Individuals Share Impulsivity and Executive Dysfunction with Alcohol-Dependent Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet Addictive Individuals Share Impulsivity and Executive Dysfunction with Alcohol-Dependent Patients
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenhe Zhou, Hongmei Zhu, Cui Li, Jun Wang

Abstract

Internet addiction disorder (IAD) should belong to a kind of behavioral addiction. Previous studies indicated that there are many similarities in the neurobiology of behavior and substance addictions. Up to date, although individuals with IAD have difficulty in suppressing their excessive online behaviors in real life, little is known about the patho-physiological and cognitive mechanisms responsible for IAD. Neuropsychological test studies have contributed significantly to our understanding of the effect of IAD on the cognitive function. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether Internet addictive individuals share impulsivity and executive dysfunction with alcohol-dependent individuals. Participants include 22 Internet addictive individuals, 22 patients with alcohol dependence (AD), and 22 normal controls (NC). All participants were measured with BIS-11, go/no-go task, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and Digit span task under the same experimental condition. Results showed that Barratt impulsiveness scale 11 scores, false alarm rate, the total response errors, perseverative errors, failure to maintain set of IAD and AD group were significantly higher than that of NC group, and hit rate, percentage of conceptual level responses, the number of categories completed, forwards scores, and backwards scores of IAD and AD group were significantly lower than that of NC group, however, no differences in above variables between IAD group and AD group were observed. These results revealed that the existence of impulsivity, deficiencies in executive function and working memory in an IAD and an AD sample, namely, Internet addictive individuals share impulsivity and executive dysfunction with alcohol-dependent patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 124 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 18%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 16%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,395,429
of 24,406,441 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,000
of 3,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,113
of 240,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#47
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,441 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.