↓ Skip to main content

Combined neuromodulatory interventions in acute experimental pain: assessment of melatonin and non-invasive brain stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined neuromodulatory interventions in acute experimental pain: assessment of melatonin and non-invasive brain stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nádia Regina Jardim da Silva, Gabriela Laste, Alícia Deitos, Luciana Cadore Stefani, Gustavo Cambraia-Canto, Iraci L. S. Torres, Andre R. Brunoni, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and melatonin can effectively treat pain. Given their potentially complementary mechanisms of action, their combination could have a synergistic effect. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that compared to the control condition and melatonin alone, tDCS combined with melatonin would have a greater effect on pain modulatory effect, as assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST) and by the pain level during the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM)-task. Furthermore, the combined treatment would have a greater cortical excitability effect as indicated by the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and on the serum BDNF level. Healthy males (n = 20), (aged 18-40 years), in a blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover, clinical trial, were randomized into three groups: sublingual melatonin (0.25 mg/kg) + a-tDCS, melatonin (0.25 mg/kg) + sham-(s)-tDCS, or sublingual placebo+sham-(s)-tDCS. Anodal stimulation (2 mA, 20 min) was applied over the primary motor cortex. There was a significant difference in the heat pain threshold (°C) for melatonin+a-tDCS vs. placebo+s-tDCS (mean difference: 4.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9 to 8.63) and melatonin+s-tDCS vs. placebo+s-tDCS (mean: 5.16, 95% CI: 0.84 to 8.36). There was no difference between melatonin+s-tDCS and melatonin+a-tDCS (mean difference: 0.29, 95% CI: -3.72 to 4.23). The mean change from the baseline on amplitude of motor evocate potential (MEP) was significantly higher in the melatonin+a-tDCS (-19.96% ± 5.2) compared with melatonin+s-tDCS group (-1.36% ± 5.35) and with placebo+s-tDCS group (3.61% ± 10.48), respectively (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). While melatonin alone or combined with a-tDCS did not significantly affect CPM task result, and serum BDNF level. The melatonin effectively reduced pain; however, its association with a-tDCS did not present an additional modulatory effect on acute induced pain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 29%
Neuroscience 20 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 32 29%