↓ Skip to main content

Stimulus onset predictability modulates proactive action control in a Go/No-go task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stimulus onset predictability modulates proactive action control in a Go/No-go task
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marika Berchicci, Giuliana Lucci, Donatella Spinelli, Francesco Di Russo

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the presence/absence of visual cues specifying the onset of an upcoming, action-related stimulus modulates pre-stimulus brain activity, associated with the proactive control of goal-directed actions. To this aim we asked 12 subjects to perform an equal probability Go/No-go task with four stimulus configurations in two conditions: (1) uncued, i.e., without any external information about the timing of stimulus onset; and (2) cued, i.e., with external visual cues providing precise information about the timing of stimulus onset. During task both behavioral performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded. Behavioral results showed faster response times in the cued than uncued condition, confirming existing literature. ERPs showed novel results in the proactive control stage, that started about 1 s before the motor response. We observed a slow rising prefrontal positive activity, more pronounced in the cued than the uncued condition. Further, also pre-stimulus activity of premotor areas was larger in cued than uncued condition. In the post-stimulus period, the P3 amplitude was enhanced when the time of stimulus onset was externally driven, confirming that external cueing enhances processing of stimulus evaluation and response monitoring. Our results suggest that different pre-stimulus processing come into play in the two conditions. We hypothesize that the large prefrontal and premotor activities recorded with external visual cues index the monitoring of the external stimuli in order to finely regulate the action.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 69%
Student > Bachelor 6 46%
Researcher 5 38%
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 23%
Other 9 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 138%
Neuroscience 6 46%
Sports and Recreations 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 4 31%