↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral correlates of the decision process in a dynamic environment: post-choice latencies reflect relative value and choice evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Behavioral correlates of the decision process in a dynamic environment: post-choice latencies reflect relative value and choice evaluation
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, September 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justine Fam, Fred Westbrook, Ehsan Arabzadeh

Abstract

One characteristic of natural environments is that outcomes vary across time. Animals need to adapt to these environmental changes and adjust their choices accordingly. In this experiment, we investigated the sensitivity with which rats could detect, and adapt to, multiple changes in the environment. Rats chose between two spouts which delivered 5% sucrose rewards with distinct probabilities. Across three phases, reward probabilities changed in size (large or small) and direction (increase or decrease). A discrete trial-structure was used, which allowed the choice process to be decomposed into three distinct response latency measures (choice execution latency, spout sampling duration, and trial-initiation latency). We found that a large decrease in reward probabilities rapidly produced the greatest change in choice proportions. The time taken to execute a choice reflected the differences in reward probabilities across the two spouts in some cases, but also reflected training history. By contrast, the amount of time rats spent responding at reward spouts in anticipation of reward consistently reflected the relative likelihood of reward across the two spouts and not the absolute probability of reward. The latency to initiate the subsequent trial reflected choice evaluation. These three response latencies thus indexed key behavioral correlates of the choice process as it unfolds in time. We discuss how this paradigm can be used to assess the corresponding neural correlates of decision-making.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Australia 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 29%
Neuroscience 4 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,332,207
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,101
of 3,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,553
of 275,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#65
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.