↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Multi-Session Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Control and Spontaneous Brain Activity in Multiple System Atrophy: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Multi-Session Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Control and Spontaneous Brain Activity in Multiple System Atrophy: A Pilot Study
Published in
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhu Liu, Huizi Ma, Victoria Poole, Xuemei Wang, Zhan Wang, Yaqin Yang, Lanxi Meng, Brad Manor, Junhong Zhou, Tao Feng

Abstract

Background: Impaired motor control is one of the most common symptoms of multiple system atrophy (MSA). It arises from dysfunction of the cerebellum and its connected neural networks, including the primary motor cortex (M1), and is associated with altered spontaneous (i.e., resting-state) brain network activity. Non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) selectively facilitates the excitability of supraspinal networks. Repeated rTMS sessions have been shown to induce long-term changes to both resting-state brain dynamics and behavior in several neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we hypothesized that a multi-session rTMS intervention would improve motor control in patients with MSA, and that such improvements would correlate with changes in resting-state brain activity. Methods: Nine participants with MSA received daily sessions of 5 Hz rTMS for 5 days. rTMS targeted both the cerebellum and the bilateral M1. Before and within 3 days after the intervention, motor control was assessed by the motor item of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS). Resting-state brain activity was recorded by blood-oxygen-level dependency (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging. The "complexity" of resting-state brain activity fluctuations was quantified within seven well-known functional cortical networks using multiscale entropy, a technique that estimates the degree of irregularity of the BOLD time-series across multiple scales of time. Results: The rTMS intervention was well-attended and was not associated with any adverse events. Average motor scores were lower (i.e., better performance) following the rTMS intervention as compared to baseline (t8 = 2.3, p = 0.003). Seven of nine participants exhibited such pre-to-post intervention improvements. A trend toward an increase in resting-state complexity was observed within the motor network (t8 = 1.86, p = 0.07). Participants who exhibited greater increases in motor network resting-state complexity demonstrated greater improvement in motor control (r2= 0.72, p = 0.004). Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that a five-session rTMS intervention targeting the cerebellum and bilateral M1 is feasible and safe for those with MSA. More definitive, well-controlled trials are warranted to confirm our preliminary results that rTMS may alleviate the severity of motor dysfunction and modulate the multiscale dynamics of motor network brain activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 24%
Psychology 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,945,904
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#2,428
of 3,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,365
of 327,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#55
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.