The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retaining Adolescent and Young Adult Participants in Research During a Pandemic: Best Practices From Two Large-Scale Developmental Neuroimaging Studies (NCANDA and ABCD)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.597902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate B. Nooner, Tammy Chung, Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing, Ty Brumback, Zjanya Arwood, Susan F. Tapert, Sandra A. Brown, Linda Cottler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,943,720
of 25,026,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#1,741
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,575
of 516,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
#57
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,026,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.