↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Parent Wireless Assistive Interface for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands for Children

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurorobotics, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a Parent Wireless Assistive Interface for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands for Children
Published in
Frontiers in Neurorobotics, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yutaro Hiyoshi, Yuta Murai, Yoshiko Yabuki, Kenichi Takahana, Soichiro Morishita, Yinlai Jiang, Shunta Togo, Shinichiro Takayama, Hiroshi Yokoi

Abstract

In this study, a one-degree-of-freedom myoelectric prosthesis system was proposed using a Parent Wireless Assistive Interface (PWAI) that allowed an external assistant (e. g., the parent of the user) to immediately adjust the parameters of the prosthetic hand controller. In the PWAI, the myoelectric potential of use of the upper limb was plotted on an external terminal in real time. Simultaneously, the assistant adjusted the parameters of the prosthetic hand control device and manually manipulated the prosthetic hand. With these functions, children that have difficulty verbally communicating could obtain properly adjusted prosthetic hands. In addition, non-experts could easily adjust and manually manipulate the prosthesis; therefore, training for the prosthetic hands could be performed at home. Two types of hand motion discrimination methods were constructed in this study of the myoelectric control system: (1) a threshold control based on the myoelectric potential amplitude information and (2) a pattern recognition of the frequency domain features. In an evaluation test of the prosthesis threshold control system, child subjects achieved discrimination rates as high as 89%, compared with 96% achieved by adult subjects. Furthermore, the high discrimination rate was maintained by sequentially updating the threshold value. In addition, a discrimination rate of 82% on average was obtained by recognizing three motions using the pattern recognition method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 50%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2018.
All research outputs
#21,356,072
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#656
of 1,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,308
of 345,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neurorobotics
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,062 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.