↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal dark matter: the emerging role of microRNAs in neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuronal dark matter: the emerging role of microRNAs in neurodegeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2013.00178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily F. Goodall, Paul R. Heath, Oliver Bandmann, Janine Kirby, Pamela J. Shaw

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, abundant RNA molecules that constitute part of the cell's non-coding RNA "dark matter." In recent years, the discovery of miRNAs has revolutionised the traditional view of gene expression and our understanding of miRNA biogenesis and function has expanded. Altered expression of miRNAs is increasingly recognized as a feature of many disease states, including neurodegeneration. Here, we review the emerging role for miRNA dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and Huntington's disease pathogenesis. We emphasize the complex nature of gene regulatory networks and the need for systematic studies, with larger sample cohorts than have so far been reported, to reveal the most important miRNA regulators in disease. Finally, miRNA diversity and their potential to target multiple pathways, offers novel clinical applications for miRNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic agents in neurodegenerative diseases.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Spain 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 279 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 20%
Researcher 48 16%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 62 21%
Unknown 34 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 15%
Neuroscience 37 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 43 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#3,559,714
of 26,388,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#727
of 4,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,720
of 294,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#25
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.