↓ Skip to main content

A use-dependent increase in release sites drives facilitation at calretinin-deficient cerebellar parallel-fiber synapses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A use-dependent increase in release sites drives facilitation at calretinin-deficient cerebellar parallel-fiber synapses
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Brachtendorf, Jens Eilers, Hartmut Schmidt

Abstract

Endogenous Ca(2+)-binding proteins affect synaptic transmitter release and short-term plasticity (STP) by buffering presynaptic Ca(2+) signals. At parallel-fiber (PF)-to-Purkinje neuron (PN) synapses in the cerebellar cortex loss of calretinin (CR), the major buffer at PF terminals, results in increased presynaptic Ca(2+) transients and an almost doubling of the initial vesicular releases probability (p r). Surprisingly, however, it has been reported that loss of CR from PF synapses does not alter paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), while it affects presynaptic Ca(2+) signals as well as p r. Here, we addressed this puzzling observation by analyzing the frequency- and Ca(2+)-dependence of PPF at unitary PF-to-PN synapses of wild-type (WT) and CR-deficient (CR(-/-)) mice using paired recordings and computer simulations. Our analysis revealed that PPF in CR(-/-) is indeed smaller than in the WT, to a degree, however, that indicates that rapid vesicle replenishment and recruitment of additional release sites dominate the synaptic efficacy of the second response. These Ca(2+)-driven processes operate more effectively in the absence of CR, thereby, explaining the preservation of robust PPF in the mutants.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 8 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,568
of 4,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,477
of 352,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#77
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,239 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.