↓ Skip to main content

Dendritic patch-clamp recordings from cerebellar granule cells demonstrate electrotonic compactness

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dendritic patch-clamp recordings from cerebellar granule cells demonstrate electrotonic compactness
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2015.00093
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor Delvendahl, Isabelle Straub, Stefan Hallermann

Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells (GCs), the smallest neurons in the brain, have on average four short dendrites that receive high-frequency mossy fiber inputs conveying sensory information. The short length of the dendrites suggests that GCs are electrotonically compact allowing unfiltered integration of dendritic inputs. The small average diameter of the dendrites (~0.7 µm), however, argues for dendritic filtering. Previous studies based on somatic recordings and modeling indicated that GCs are electrotonically extremely compact. Here, we performed patch-clamp recordings from GC dendrites in acute brain slices of mice to directly analyze the electrotonic properties of GCs. Strikingly, the input resistance did not differ significantly between dendrites and somata of GCs. Furthermore, spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) were similar in amplitude at dendritic and somatic recording sites. From the dendritic and somatic input resistances we determined parameters characterizing the electrotonic compactness of GCs. These data directly demonstrate that cerebellar GCs are electrotonically compact and thus ideally suited for efficient high-frequency information transfer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 29 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 27%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,333,503
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,664
of 4,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,120
of 263,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#66
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.