The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Neurodegeneration and microtubule dynamics: death by a thousand cuts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2016.00026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jyoti Dubey, Neena Ratnakaran, Sandhya P. Koushika |
| Abstract |
[This corrects the article on p. 343 in vol. 9, PMID: 26441521.]. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Researcher | 1 | <1% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | <1% |
| Student > Master | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,310,658
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,586
of 4,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,954
of 400,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#77
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.