You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of MMP9 for Blood Brain Barrier Disruption and Hemorrhagic Transformation Following Ischemic Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2016.00056 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Renée J. Turner, Frank R. Sharp |
| Abstract |
Numerous studies have documented increases in matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), specifically MMP-9 levels following stroke, with such perturbations associated with disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB), increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, and worsened outcome. Despite this, controversy remains as to which cells release MMP-9 at the normal and pathological BBB, with even less clarity in the context of stroke. This may be further complicated by the influence of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment. The aim of the present review is to examine the relationship between neutrophils, MMP-9 and tPA following ischemic stroke to elucidate which cells are responsible for the increases in MMP-9 and resultant barrier changes and hemorrhage observed following stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 42 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,269,008
of 25,393,455 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#626
of 4,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,602
of 313,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#13
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.