↓ Skip to main content

Closed-Loop Neuroscience and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Tale of Two Loops

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Closed-Loop Neuroscience and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Tale of Two Loops
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Zrenner, Paolo Belardinelli, Florian Müller-Dahlhaus, Ulf Ziemann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 341 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 21%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 66 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 91 26%
Engineering 51 15%
Psychology 33 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 92 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,438,995
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#153
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,969
of 318,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.