↓ Skip to main content

Modeling the Cerebellar Microcircuit: New Strategies for a Long-Standing Issue

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling the Cerebellar Microcircuit: New Strategies for a Long-Standing Issue
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, July 2016
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2016.00176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egidio D’Angelo, Alberto Antonietti, Stefano Casali, Claudia Casellato, Jesus A. Garrido, Niceto Rafael Luque, Lisa Mapelli, Stefano Masoli, Alessandra Pedrocchi, Francesca Prestori, Martina Francesca Rizza, Eduardo Ros

Abstract

The cerebellar microcircuit has been the work bench for theoretical and computational modeling since the beginning of neuroscientific research. The regular neural architecture of the cerebellum inspired different solutions to the long-standing issue of how its circuitry could control motor learning and coordination. Originally, the cerebellar network was modeled using a statistical-topological approach that was later extended by considering the geometrical organization of local microcircuits. However, with the advancement in anatomical and physiological investigations, new discoveries have revealed an unexpected richness of connections, neuronal dynamics and plasticity, calling for a change in modeling strategies, so as to include the multitude of elementary aspects of the network into an integrated and easily updatable computational framework. Recently, biophysically accurate "realistic" models using a bottom-up strategy accounted for both detailed connectivity and neuronal non-linear membrane dynamics. In this perspective review, we will consider the state of the art and discuss how these initial efforts could be further improved. Moreover, we will consider how embodied neurorobotic models including spiking cerebellar networks could help explaining the role and interplay of distributed forms of plasticity. We envisage that realistic modeling, combined with closed-loop simulations, will help to capture the essence of cerebellar computations and could eventually be applied to neurological diseases and neurorobotic control systems.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 24%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 23 12%
Other 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 73 38%
Engineering 28 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Computer Science 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,580,307
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,198
of 4,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,381
of 370,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#13
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.