The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current Concepts on the Physiopathological Relevance of Dopaminergic Receptors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2017.00027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ada Ledonne, Nicola B. Mercuri |
| Abstract |
Dopamine (DA) is a key neurotransmitter modulating essential functions of the central nervous system (CNS), like voluntary movement, reward, several cognitive functions and goal-oriented behaviors. The factual relevance of DAergic transmission can be well appreciated by considering that its dysfunction is recognized as a core alteration in several devastating neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Parkinson's disease (PD) and associated movement disorders, as well as, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and addiction. Here we present an overview of the current knowledge on the involvement of DAergic receptors in the regulation of key physiological brain activities, and the consequences of their dysfunctions in brain disorders such as PD, schizophrenia and addiction. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 44 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2017.
All research outputs
#20,403,545
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#3,587
of 4,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,960
of 420,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#77
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.