↓ Skip to main content

New Tools to Study Astrocyte Ca2+ Signal Dynamics in Brain Networks In Vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Tools to Study Astrocyte Ca2+ Signal Dynamics in Brain Networks In Vivo
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2017.00134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriele Losi, Letizia Mariotti, Michele Sessolo, Giorgio Carmignoto

Abstract

Sensory information processing is a fundamental operation in the brain that is based on dynamic interactions between different neuronal populations. Astrocytes, a type of glial cells, have been proposed to represent active elements of brain microcircuits that, through dynamic interactions with neurons, provide a modulatory control of neuronal network activity. Specifically, astrocytes in different brain regions have been described to respond to neuronal signals with intracellular Ca(2+) elevations that represent a key step in the functional recruitment of astrocytes to specific brain circuits. Accumulating evidence shows that Ca(2+) elevations regulate the release of gliotransmitters that, in turn, modulate synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability. Recent studies also provided new insights into the spatial and temporal features of astrocytic Ca(2+) elevations revealing a surprising complexity of Ca(2+) signal dynamics in astrocytes. Here we discuss how recently developed experimental tools such as the genetically encoded Ca(2+) indicators (GECI), optogenetics and chemogenetics can be applied to the study of astrocytic Ca(2+) signals in the living brain.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 23%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 46 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Engineering 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 37 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,551,243
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,884
of 4,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,919
of 310,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#34
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.