↓ Skip to main content

Chondroitin Sulfate Expression in Perineuronal Nets After Goldfish Spinal Cord Lesion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chondroitin Sulfate Expression in Perineuronal Nets After Goldfish Spinal Cord Lesion
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2018.00063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihito Takeda, Masashige Shuto, Kengo Funakoshi

Abstract

Perineuronal nets (PNNs) surrounding neuronal cell bodies regulate neuronal plasticity during development, but their roles in regeneration are unclear. In the PNNs, chondroitin sulfate (CS) is assumed to be involved in inhibiting contact formation. Here, we examined CS expression in PNNs in the ventral horn of a goldfish hemisected spinal cord in which descending axons regenerate beyond the lesion to connect with distal spinal neurons. In intact fish, chondroitin sulfate A (CS-A)-positive PNNs accounted for 5.0% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons, and 48% of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-immunoreactive neurons. At 2, 4 and 8 weeks after spinal hemisection, CS-A-positive PNNs accounted for 8.4%-9.9% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons, and 50%-60% of ChAT-immunoreactive neurons, which was not significantly different from intact fish. Chondroitin sulfate C (CS-C)-positive PNNs accounted for 6.4% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neuron, and 67% of ChAT-immunoreactive neurons in intact fish. At 2, 4 and 8 weeks after spinal hemisection, CS-C-positive PNNs accounted for 7.9%, 5.5% and 4.3%, respectively, of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons, and 65%, 52% and 42%, respectively, of ChAT-immunoreactive neurons, demonstrating a significant decrease at 4 and 8 weeks after spinal hemisection. Among ventral horn neurons that received descending axons labeled with tetramethylrhodamine dextran amine (RDA) applied at the level of the first spinal nerve, CS-A-positive PNNs accounted for 53% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons. At 2 and 4 weeks after spinal hemisection, CS-A-positive PNNs accounted for 57% and 56% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons, which was not significantly different from intact fish. CS-C-positive PNNs, accounted for 48% of HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons that received RDA-labeled axons. At 2 and 4 weeks after spinal hemisection, CS-C-positive PNNs significantly decreased to 22% of the HuC/D-immunoreactive neurons, and by 4 weeks after spinal hemisection they had returned to 47%. These findings suggest that CS expression is maintained in the PNNs after spinal cord lesion, and that the descending axons regenerate to preferentially terminate on neurons not covered with CS-C-positive PNNs. Therefore, CS-C in the PNNs possibly inhibits new contact with descending axons, and plasticity in the spinal neurons might be endowed by downregulation of CS-C in the PNNs in the regeneration process after spinal hemisection in goldfish.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,933,348
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,957
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,963
of 332,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#76
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.