↓ Skip to main content

Morphological and Physiological Plasticity of Spinal Lamina II GABA Neurons Is Induced by Sciatic Nerve Chronic Constriction Injury in Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morphological and Physiological Plasticity of Spinal Lamina II GABA Neurons Is Induced by Sciatic Nerve Chronic Constriction Injury in Mice
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2018.00143
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongmei Zhang, Yan Li, Qing Yang, Xian-Guo Liu, Patrick M. Dougherty

Abstract

Mice with transgenic insertion of code for enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at the locus for glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 (GAD67), one of two key enzymes for the synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were used to test whether the morphological properties of these neurons show plasticity with nerve injury. Physiological properties and the delivery of intracellular label to EGFP-expressing lamina II neurons was done using whole-cell patch-clamp in spinal cord slices from sham and chronic constriction injury (CCI) mice. As well, whole cell recordings were made of non-EGFP labeled cells to ascertain changes in overall inhibitory signaling following CCI. The EGFP labeled neurons in both sham and CCI mice exhibited islet, central and vertical cell morphological profiles but no radial cell profiles were observed. The length of cell dendrites was found to be significantly shorter in CCI mice for all cell profile types. The longest neurites averaged 155.96 ± 18.29 μm in CCI mice compared to 334.93 ± 29.48 μm in sham control mice. No change was observed in either passive or evoked membrane properties of EGFP-expressing neurons in CCI versus sham mice. Meanwhile, the frequency of miniature inhibitory post-synaptic currents of non-EGFP expressing spinal lamina II neurons was significantly reduced. These results suggest that reduced inhibitory output from GABA neurons occurs with nerve injury in part due to altered cell morphology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,152,619
of 23,305,591 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,445
of 4,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,942
of 330,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#53
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,305,591 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.