You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cochlea-Specific Deletion of Cav1.3 Calcium Channels Arrests Inner Hair Cell Differentiation and Unravels Pitfalls of Conditional Mouse Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2019.00225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie Eckrich, Dietmar Hecker, Katharina Sorg, Kerstin Blum, Kerstin Fischer, Stefan Münkner, Gentiana Wenzel, Bernhard Schick, Jutta Engel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 24% |
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 5 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,021,930
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#2,981
of 4,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,871
of 350,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#89
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.