You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Glial Cells, Maladaptive Plasticity, and Neurodegeneration: Mechanisms, Targeted Therapies, and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2021.682524 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sohaib Ali Korai, Giovanna Sepe, Livio Luongo, Andrea Beatriz Cragnolini, Giovanni Cirillo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#882
of 4,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,331
of 437,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#40
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.