↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: A Novel Microtubule-Tau Association Enhancer and Neuroprotective Drug Candidate: Ac-SKIP

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: A Novel Microtubule-Tau Association Enhancer and Neuroprotective Drug Candidate: Ac-SKIP
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fncel.2021.687301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yanina Ivashko-Pachima, Illana Gozes

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#882
of 4,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,683
of 448,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#45
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.