The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deficiency of the CYLD Impairs Fear Memory of Mice and Disrupts Neuronal Activity and Synaptic Transmission in the Basolateral Amygdala
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2021.740165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui-dong Li, Dan-ni Li, Li Yang, Cheng Long |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,731,856
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#1,232
of 4,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,261
of 438,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#50
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.