The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Polymerases and DNA Repair in Neurons: Implications in Neuronal Survival and Neurodegenerative Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncel.2022.852002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoling Li, Guanghui Cao, Xiaokang Liu, Tie-Shan Tang, Caixia Guo, Hongmei Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,196,781
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#857
of 4,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,450
of 437,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
#29
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.