↓ Skip to main content

Cortical connectivity maps reveal anatomically distinct areas in the parietal cortex of the rat

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical connectivity maps reveal anatomically distinct areas in the parietal cortex of the rat
Published in
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fncir.2014.00146
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron A. Wilber, Benjamin J. Clark, Alexis J. Demecha, Lilia Mesina, Jessica M. Vos, Bruce L. McNaughton

Abstract

A central feature of theories of spatial navigation involves the representation of spatial relationships between objects in complex environments. The parietal cortex has long been linked to the processing of spatial visual information and recent evidence from single unit recording in rodents suggests a role for this region in encoding egocentric and world-centered frames. The rat parietal cortex can be subdivided into four distinct rostral-caudal and medial-lateral regions, which includes a zone previously characterized as secondary visual cortex. At present, very little is known regarding the relative connectivity of these parietal subdivisions. Thus, we set out to map the connectivity of the entire anterior-posterior and medial-lateral span of this region. To do this we used anterograde and retrograde tracers in conjunction with open source neuronal segmentation and tracer detection tools to generate whole brain connectivity maps of parietal inputs and outputs. Our present results show that inputs to the parietal cortex varied significantly along the medial-lateral, but not the rostral-caudal axis. Specifically, retrosplenial connectivity is greater medially, but connectivity with visual cortex, though generally sparse, is more significant laterally. Finally, based on connection density, the connectivity between parietal cortex and hippocampus is indirect and likely achieved largely via dysgranular retrosplenial cortex. Thus, similar to primates, the parietal cortex of rats exhibits a difference in connectivity along the medial-lateral axis, which may represent functionally distinct areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 24%
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Master 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 74 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,317,653
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#308
of 1,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,051
of 358,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.