You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cellular and Molecular Underpinnings of Neuronal Assembly in the Central Auditory System during Mouse Development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2017.00018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Di Bonito, Michèle Studer |
| Abstract |
During development, the organization of the auditory system into distinct functional subcircuits depends on the spatially and temporally ordered sequence of neuronal specification, differentiation, migration and connectivity. Regional patterning along the antero-posterior axis and neuronal subtype specification along the dorso-ventral axis intersect to determine proper neuronal fate and assembly of rhombomere-specific auditory subcircuits. By taking advantage of the increasing number of transgenic mouse lines, recent studies have expanded the knowledge of developmental mechanisms involved in the formation and refinement of the auditory system. Here, we summarize several findings dealing with the molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie the assembly of central auditory subcircuits during mouse development, focusing primarily on the rhombomeric and dorso-ventral origin of auditory nuclei and their associated molecular genetic pathways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
| Researcher | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,703,089
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#290
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,093
of 310,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.