The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modulation of Hippocampal Circuits by Muscarinic and Nicotinic Receptors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2017.00102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Holger Dannenberg, Kimberly Young, Michael Hasselmo |
| Abstract |
This article provides a review of the effects of activation of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors on the physiological properties of circuits in the hippocampal formation. Previous articles have described detailed computational hypotheses about the role of cholinergic neuromodulation in enhancing the dynamics for encoding in cortical structures and the role of reduced cholinergic modulation in allowing consolidation of previously encoded information. This article will focus on addressing the broad scope of different modulatory effects observed within hippocampal circuits, highlighting the heterogeneity of cholinergic modulation in terms of the physiological effects of activation of muscarinic and nicotinic receptors and the heterogeneity of effects on different subclasses of neurons. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 65 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,319,780
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#708
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,051
of 445,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.