The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neuromodulatory Correlates of Pupil Dilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neural Circuits, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncir.2018.00021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rylan S. Larsen, Jack Waters |
| Abstract |
Pupillometry has long been used as a measure of brain state. Changes in pupil diameter are thought to coincide with the activity of neuromodulators, including noradrenaline and acetylcholine, producing alterations in the brain state and corresponding changes in behavior. Here we review mechanisms underlying the control of pupil diameter and how these mechanisms are correlated with changes in cortical activity and the recruitment of neuromodulatory circuits. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 16% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 73% |
| Scientists | 21 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 450 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 23% |
| Researcher | 73 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 50 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 91 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 127 | 28% |
| Psychology | 74 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 5% |
| Engineering | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 120 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#631,406
of 26,343,220 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#14
of 1,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,012
of 353,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neural Circuits
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,343,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.