The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identifying Individuals With Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Working Memory-Induced Intra-Subject Variability of Resting-State EEGs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2021.700467 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thanh-Tung Trinh, Chia-Fen Tsai, Yu-Tsung Hsiao, Chun-Ying Lee, Chien-Te Wu, Yi-Hung Liu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 6 | 17% |
Computer Science | 6 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,291,488
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#194
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,002
of 432,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.