The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A neural basis for learning sequential memory in brain loop structures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fncom.2024.1421458 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duho Sihn, Sung-Phil Kim |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 65% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,248,562
of 26,544,375 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#125
of 1,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,473
of 202,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,375 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.