The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vascular Tone and Neurovascular Coupling: Considerations Toward an Improved In Vitro Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroenergetics, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnene.2010.00016 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica A. Filosa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,934,011
of 23,884,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#19
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,273
of 169,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroenergetics
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one scored the same or higher as 20 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.