↓ Skip to main content

A simple implantation method for flexible, multisite microelectrodes into rat brains

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroengineering, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A simple implantation method for flexible, multisite microelectrodes into rat brains
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroengineering, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fneng.2013.00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja Richter, Yijing Xie, Anett Schumacher, Susanne Löffler, Robert D. Kirch, Jaafar Al-Hasani, Daniel H. Rapoport, Charli Kruse, Andreas Moser, Volker Tronnier, Sandra Danner, Ulrich G. Hofmann

Abstract

A long term functional and reliable coupling between neural tissue and implanted microelectrodes is the key issue in acquiring neural electrophysiological signals or therapeutically excite neural tissue. The currently often used rigid micro-electrodes are thought to cause a severe foreign body reaction resulting in a thick glial scar and consequently a poor tissue-electrode coupling in the chronic phase. We hypothesize, that this adverse effect might be remedied by probes compliant to the soft brain tissue, i.e., replacing rigid electrodes by flexible ones. Unfortunately, this flexibility comes at the price of a low stiffness, which makes targeted low trauma implantation very challenging. In this study, we demonstrate an adaptable and simple method to implant extremely flexible microprobes even to deep areas of rat's brain. Implantation of flexible probes is achieved by rod supported stereotactic insertion fostered by a hydrogel (2% agarose in PBS) cushion on the exposed skull. We were thus able to implant very flexible micro-probes in 70 rats as deep as the rodent's subthalamic nucleus. This work describes in detail the procedures and steps needed for minimal invasive, but reliable implantation of flexible probes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 110 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 29%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 40 34%
Neuroscience 21 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Materials Science 4 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 24 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,347,414
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#61
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,056
of 280,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroengineering
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.